POWELL et al. V. Branstrom et al. - Page 1



      1                         The opinion in support of the decision being                                   
      2                     entered today is not binding precedent of the board.                               
      34     Paper 24                                                                                          
      5      Filed by:                                                                                         
      67     Merits Panel                                                                                      
      8      Mail Stop Interference                                                                            
      9      P.O. Box 1450                                   Filed 26 April 2006                               
     10      Alexandria Va 22313-1450                                                                          
     11      Tel: 571-272-9797                                                                                 
     12      Fax: 571-273-0042                                                                                 
     13                                                                                                        
     14                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
     15 _______________                                                                                        
     16                                                                                                        
     17                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
     18                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
     19                   (Senior Administrative Patent Judge McKelvey)                                        
     20 _______________                                                                                        
     21                                                                                                        
     22                       ARTHUR A. BRANSTROM, DONATA R. SIZEMORE                                          
     23                                  and JERALD C. SADOFF,                                                 
     24                                                                                                        
     25                                        Junior Party                                                    
     26                                (Application 09/512,810),                                               
     27                                                                                                        
     28                                               v.                                                       
     29                                                                                                        
     30                          ROBERT J. POWELL, GEORGE K. LEWIS                                             
     31                                    and DAVID M. HONE,                                                  
     32                                                                                                        
     33                                        Senior Party                                                    
     34                                    (Patent 5,877,159).                                                 
     35 _______________                                                                                        
     36                                                                                                        
     37                          Patent Interference 105,428 (McK)                                             
     38                                  Technology Center 1600                                                
     39 _______________                                                                                        
     40                                                                                                        
     41      Before:  McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and MEDLEY                                 
     42      and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
     43                                                                                                        
     44                                                                                                        
     45      McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     
     46                                                                                                        
     47                                                                                                        
     48                                       FINAL JUDGMENT                                                   
     49                                                                                                        
     50            Upon consideration of BRANSTROM'S NOTICE OF NO RESPONSE TO                                  
     51      SHOW CAUSE ORDER (Paper 21), it is                                                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007