Appeal No. 2004-0659 Application No. 09/111,978 Step 3 is applied when the broadening relates to surrendered subject matter and involves a determination whether the surrendered subject matter has crept into the reissue application claim. Id. The following principles were articulated by the Federal Circuit, 131 F.3d at 1470, 45 USPQ2d at 1165: Substep (1): if the reissue claim is as broad as or broader than the canceled or amended claim in all aspects, the recapture rule bars the claim; Substep (2): if it is narrower in all aspects, the recapture rules does not apply, but other rejections are possible; Substep (3): if the reissue claim is broader in some aspects, but narrower in others, then: (a) if the reissue claim is as broad as or broader in an aspect germane to a prior art rejection, but narrower in another aspect completely unrelated to the rejection, the recapture rule bars the claim; (b) if the reissue claim is narrower in an aspect germane to [a] prior art rejection, and broader in an aspect unrelated to the rejection, the recapture rule does not bar the claim, but other rejections are possible. (4) NORTH AMERICAN CONTAINER In North American Container, Inc. v. Plastipak Packaging, Inc., 415 F.3d 1335, 75 USPQ2d 1545 (Fed. Cir. 2005), the Federal Circuit had occasion to further address Substep (3)(a) of Clement. North American Container involved a reissue patent, which had been held invalid by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The district court bottomed its invalidity holding based on a violation of the recapture rule. During prosecution of an application for patent, an examiner rejected the claims over a combination of two prior art references: Dechenne and Jakobsen. To overcome the rejection, North American Container limited its application claims by specifying that a shape of “inner walls” of a base of a container was “generally convex.” North American Container convinced the - 36 -Page: Previous 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007