Ex Parte BIEMAN - Page 36




                  Appeal No. 2004-0659                                                                                           
                  Application No. 09/111,978                                                                                     

                          Step 3 is applied when the broadening relates to surrendered subject matter and                        
                  involves a determination whether the surrendered subject matter has crept into the reissue                     
                  application claim.  Id.  The following principles were articulated by the Federal Circuit,                     
                  131 F.3d at 1470, 45 USPQ2d at 1165:                                                                           
                                         Substep (1):  if the reissue claim is as broad as or broader than the                   
                                  canceled or amended claim in all aspects, the recapture rule bars the claim;                   

                                         Substep (2): if it is narrower in all aspects, the recapture rules                      
                                  does not apply, but other rejections are possible;                                             
                                         Substep (3):  if the reissue claim is broader in some aspects, but                      
                                  narrower in others, then:                                                                      
                                                 (a)    if the reissue claim is as broad as or broader in an                     
                                         aspect germane to a prior art rejection, but narrower in another                        
                                         aspect completely unrelated to the rejection, the recapture rule bars                   
                                         the claim;                                                                              
                                                 (b)    if the reissue claim is narrower in an aspect                            
                                         germane to [a] prior art rejection, and broader in an aspect                            
                                         unrelated to the rejection, the recapture rule does not bar the claim,                  
                                         but other rejections are possible.                                                      
                                                                  (4)                                                            
                                                 NORTH AMERICAN CONTAINER                                                        
                          In North American Container, Inc. v. Plastipak Packaging, Inc., 415 F.3d 1335,                         
                  75 USPQ2d 1545 (Fed. Cir. 2005), the Federal Circuit had occasion to further address                           
                  Substep (3)(a) of Clement.                                                                                     
                          North American Container involved a reissue patent, which had been held invalid                        
                  by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.  The district court bottomed                    
                  its invalidity holding based on a violation of the recapture rule.  During prosecution of an                   
                  application for patent, an examiner rejected the claims over a combination of two prior                        
                  art references:  Dechenne and Jakobsen.  To overcome the rejection, North American                             
                  Container limited its application claims by specifying that a shape of “inner walls” of a                      
                  base of a container was “generally convex.”  North American Container convinced the                            
                                                             - 36 -                                                              





Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007