Ex Parte KRAUS - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-0841                                                          
          Application No. 08/230,083                                                    

                    3.   The reissue application contains claims 1-14 and 16.           
                    4.   Claims 14 and 16 have been rejected under                      
          35 U.S.C. § 251 on the grounds that these claims seek to                      
          recapture subject matter surrendered when the patent sought to be             
          reissued was granted.                                                         
                    5.   Claims 1-13, the remaining claims, have been                   
          indicated as being allowable.                                                 
                    6.   The principal issue before the Board is whether                
          applicant has established that the examiner erred in rejecting                
          claims 14 and 16 based on recapture.                                          
               B.   Findings of fact                                                    
               The following findings of fact are believed to be supported              
          by a preponderance of the evidence.                                           
                                     The invention                                      
                    1.   The invention relates to a check valve device for              
          preventing reverse air flow in the ventilation duct leading to                
          the passenger space of a motor vehicle (the ‘731 patent at col.               
          1, lines 6-9).                                                                
                    2.   The patent also refers to the "device" as an                   
          "assembly."                                                                   
                    3.   The invention can be understood by reference to                
          Figures 1 through 11 of the drawings of the ‘731 patent, all of               
          which are reproduced in Appendix 1 of this opinion.                           

                                         - 3 -3                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007