Ex Parte SIEFERT - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                           
                       publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          


                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                            Ex parte DAVID M. SIEFERT                                                  
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                               Appeal No. 2005-0985                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/003,000                                                
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                        
              Before GROSS, BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                




                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                      
              rejection of claims 16, 17, and 19-22, which are all the claims remaining in the                         
              application.                                                                                             
                     We affirm.                                                                                        












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007