Ex Parte SIEFERT - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-0985                                                                                     
              Application No. 09/003,000                                                                               

                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                     The invention is directed to a method for presenting material to a learner,                       
              whereby profiles of learners are stored to enhance learning by selecting a preferred                     
              presentation of the material.   Representative claim 16 is reproduced below.                             
                     16.    A method of presenting material on a same topic to a learner, comprising:                  
                            (a) storing on one or more computers a plurality of materials including a                  
                     collection of alternate presentations, each covering the same topic;                              
                            (b) providing a communications link to the materials, via a data channel,                  
                     with a communicator of the learner;                                                               
                            (c) storing profiles of learners, which contain information about                          
                     characteristics of each learner including information about each learner’s                        
                     curriculum, teaching strategies, present standing and personalized information;                   
                            (d) selecting a preferred presentation from the collection of alternate                    
                     presentations based on the learner’s profile; and                                                 
                            (e) making the selected presentation to the learner.                                       
                     The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                   
              Lee et al. (Lee)                   WO 93/16454                        Aug. 19, 1993                      
                     Claims 16, 17, 19, 20, and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being                       
              anticipated by Lee.                                                                                      
                     Claim 21 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lee.                    
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (mailed Nov. 19, 2002) and the Examiner’s                         
              Answer (mailed Oct. 1, 2004) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief                 



                                                          -2-                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007