Ex Parte KOPPOLU et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2005-1431                                                                                                 
               Application 09/442,070                                                                                               

               collectively "Eolas") against Microsoft Corporation: Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft                           
               Corp., No. 99 C 0626 (N.D. Ill.).  Specifically, Eolas asserted infringement of the Doyle patent                     
               claims by Microsoft's Internet Explorer program.                                                                     
                       The district court, pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, 517 U.S. 370,                               
               34 USPQ2d 1321 (1996), entered a memorandum opinion and order construing the following                               
               phrase from Doyle patent claims 1 and 6: "wherein said object has type information associated                        
               with it utilized by said browser to identify and locate an executable application."  Eolas                           
               Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 99 C 0626, 2000 WL 1898853 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 29,                            
               2000), at *4 (not reported in F.Supp.2d).  The court's construction of these terms was based in                      
               part on arguments made during the prosecution history of the Doyle patent to distinguish the                         
               claims from appellants'  U.S. Patent 5,581,686, referred to by the court as "the Koppolu patent,"                    
               which has the same disclosure as the '701 patent.7  Id. at *11-13, 16.  The court construed                          
               "executable application" to mean "any computer program code, that is not the operating system                        
               or a utility, that is launched to enable an end-user to directly interact with data.”  Id. at *14.                   
               Regarding the phrase "utilized by said browser to identify and locate," the court held that “the                     
               functions of utilizing the type information to identify and locate the executable application must                   
               be performed by the browser, not the operating system as in Koppolu's OLE [Object Linking and                        
               Embedding]."  Id. at *18.                                                                                            

                                                                                                                                   
                       7   Appellants' '686 patent, like their '701 patent, purports to be a continuation of                        
               Application 08/229,264, filed April 15, 1994.                                                                        

                                                                 3                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007