Appeal No. 2005-1674 Application 09/613,153 The specification, after explaining that companies which announced stock buybacks have outperformed the market by a margin of up to 9% in the four years after the initial repurchase announcement, col. 1, ll. 18-24, and noting that there is conflicting literature as to whether companies which actually had repurchased their stock outperformed others in the market, col. 1, ll. 34-37, explains that the price/sales ratio has been the best single factor for predicting company performance: To develop successful investment strategies, financial advisers currently rely on a myriad of theories and factors in an attempt to find the best investment vehicles for their clients. These theories are often based on age-old economic trends or newly developed calculations and stock screening techniques. One such recognized value factor for predicting or analyzing company performance is the price/sales ratio. The price/sales ratio is the relationship of a company's stock price to its annual sales (or revenues) per share. In the book, What Works on Wall Street, by J. P. O'Shanunnasey (1996), the author showed that the 50 stocks with the lowest price/sales ratio out performed the market by an average of 4.27 percentage points from Dec. 31, 1952 to Dec. 31, 1994. This level of outperformance was greater than the difference produced by any single variable. Col. 1, ll. 38-53. According to the specification, "[t]here is, however, no single method that combines the performance of the price/sales ratio with the buyback theory to maximize the performance of a stock investment portfolio," col. 1, ll. 54-57 (emphasis added), and thus "there exists a need for an investment strategy that automatically determines those companies buying back the greatest percentage of their stock while maintaining the lowest price/sales ratio." Col. 1, ll. 61-64 (emphasis added). However, the "Summary of the Invention" and the "Detailed which was requested by the panel at oral argument. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007