Appeal No. 2005-1722 Application 10/420,901 to make a particular purchase, in other words, to promote particular sales, whereas the "award points" of the claimed invention are to encourage customer loyalty (RBr3-4). It is argued that the examiner does not address the argument that Cameron's "marketing promotions" do not suggest "award points" that are issued in connection with a purchase and redeemable for rewards (RBr4). It is argued that the examiner incorrectly assumes that a "club" at column 20, line 24 of Cameron implies a "promotional club" or "loyalty club", but even accepting the contention, Cameron does not suggest a club that issues award points or that offers promotions for "looking up" promotions (RBr5). Appellant argues that the mere fact that Cameron's system could have been modified to incorporate award points that are redeemable for awards does not alone make the modification obvious (RBr6). As to the examiner's assertion that it is difficult to conduct a promotional/loyalty club without award points, appellant argues that the invention is not an award-based loyalty program, but an on-line implementation of such and it is not common knowledge or well known in the art or somehow inherent that promotional clubs also issue award points (RBr7). It is argued that the examiner's "logic" is no more than a hindsight recreation of the claimed invention (RBr7-8). The "marketing promotions" described in Cameron at column 20, lines 7-12, do not include award points. We agree - 9 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007