The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID L. KINARD, G. FRANKLIN VAUGHN Jr., SOLOMAN BEKELE, and
CHARLES KANNANLERIL
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1969
Application No. 09/933,291
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 5-10, and 13-24. Claim 12, the only other claim
pending in the application, stands objected to as dependent on a cancelled claim
(Answer, p. 2). We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007