Ex Parte STOUGHTON et al - Page 1


                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                      __________                                                          
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                      __________                                                          
                         Ex parte ROLAND STOUGHTON, GEERT SCHMID-SCHONBEIN,                                               
                                         TONY E. HUGLI and ERIK KISTLER                                                   
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No.  2005-2235                                                     
                                              Application No.  09/038,894                                                 
                                                      __________                                                          
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                      __________                                                          
                 Before ADAMS, MILLS and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                 ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                         This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                  
                 examiner’s final rejection of claims 10-18, 32-36, 38, 41 and 42, which are all the                      
                 claims pending in the application.                                                                       
                         Claims 10 and 32 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are                        
                 reproduced below:                                                                                        
                         10. A method of improving treatment outcome or reducing risk of                                  

                                assessing treatment options for a disease or condition by                                 
                             measuring cell activation levels in a subject with the disease or                            
                             condition; and, if cell activation levels are elevated, administering                        
                             activation lowering therapy prior to commencing treatment for the                            
                             disease or condition, thereby improving treatment outcome or                                 
                             reducing risk of treatment.                                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007