Ex Parte STOUGHTON et al - Page 9


                 Appeal No.  2005-2235                                                           Page 9                   
                 Application No.  09/038,894                                                                              
                 elevated, using [F]uthan,” appellants’ specification does not provide an enabling                        
                 disclosure “for any and all activation lowering therapies[,] and any and all                             
                 diseases or conditions[,] and any and all methods of assessing cellular                                  
                 activation[.]”  In this regard, the examiner asserts (id.), “[t]he art of biotechnology                  
                 is a highly unpredictable art[ ]3 and it would be an undue burden for one of                             
                 ordinary skill in the art to test any and all activation lowering therapies and any                      
                 and all diseases or conditions and any and all methods of assessing cellular                             
                 activation to see if they could perform the claimed processes.”  In the examiner’s                       
                 opinion (Answer, pages 5-6),                                                                             
                         knowing only one activation lowering therapy, one condition to treat                             
                         it with and only one type of assay in which to determine if it is                                
                         necessary, one of ordinary skill in the art would not know what                                  
                         other conditions could be treated, what other therapies could be                                 
                         used or what other assays could be used to determine if such a                                   
                         method would work. … There is no guidance on which assay would                                   
                         be useful for which disease/condition.                                                           
                         In response, appellants point out that the therapeutic target and diagnostic                     
                 indicator is cell activation.  Brief, page 24.  In this regard, appellants’ note (id.),                  
                 “[n]umerous methods and ways to lower cell activation[ ]4 are provided in the                            
                 specification (see, discussion above regarding the claimed subject matter); these                        
                 methods range from particular drugs, such as futhan, to lifestyle changes.”                              
                 According to appellants (id.),                                                                           
                         [p]rior to the instant application … cell activation had not been                                
                         identified as a diagnostic or prognostic of disease or treatment                                 
                         outcome nor as a point of therapeutic intervention.  Having                                      
                                                                                                                          
                 3 According to the examiner (Answer, page 5), “[t]he area of biotechnology is highly unpredictable       
                 since the human body in and of itself is very unpredictable.”                                            
                 4 Appellants explain (Brief, page 24), “[c]ell activation is a phenomenon that is known to those of      
                 skill in the art as are factors that lead to its elevation and some methods for its decrease.”           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007