The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KEVIN G. DONOHOE and DAVID S. BECKER
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-2239
Application No. 10/448,905
______________
ON BRIEF
______________
Before GARRIS, PAK and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the Examiner’s final rejection of claims
1 to 17 and 21 to 38.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.2
1 The subject matter of claims 18 to 20 has been indicated
as allowable by the Examiner. (Answer, p. 2)
2 In rendering the decision on appeal we have considered
Appellants’ Briefs, filed July 29, 2004 and December 20, 2004 and
the Examiner’s Answer dated October 18, 2004.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007