Ex Parte Harnish - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-2297                                                                 Παγε 2                                       
              Application No. 10/143,209                                                                                                        


                     The appellant's invention relates to an adjustable, self-correcting web substrate                                          
              folding system that can sense the physical characteristic of a moving web substrate that                                          
              is undergoing folding and adjust the fold angle geometry to provide the correct tension                                           
              (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to                                         
              the appellant's brief.                                                                                                            
                                                   THE PRIOR ART                                                                                
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                                            
              appealed claims are:                                                                                                              
              Whitley, Jr. et. al. (Whitley)  4,699,606  Oct. 13, 1987                                                                          
              Shiba      5,052,296  Oct.   1, 1991                                                                                              
              Wessman     5,902,222  May 11, 1999                                                                                               
                                                  THE REJECTIONS                                                                                
                     Claims 1 to 9, 11, and 16 to 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                                           
              anticipated by Wessman.                                                                                                           
                     Claims 1 to 7, 10 to 12, 17, and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                             
              being unpatenable over Shiba.                                                                                                     
                     Claims 13 to 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                                                 
              over Wessman in view of Whitley.                                                                                                  






















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007