Appeal No. 2005-2433
Application No. 10/259,789
Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's full commentary with regard to the
above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and
appellant regarding those rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer
(mailed August 11, 2004) for the reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant’s
brief (filed May 14, 2002) and reply brief (filed October 12, 2004) for the arguments
thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to
appellant’s specification and claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our
review, we have made the determinations which follow.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007