Appeal No. 2005-2433
Application No. 10/259,789
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 9, 11, 13
through 21, 23, 25 through 33, 35 and 37 through 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on
Fujita and that of claims 10, 12, 22, 24, 34 and 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based on
Fujita and Ohmura. Thus, the decision of the examiner
to reject claims 1 through 39 of the present application is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007