Ex Parte Lowry - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-2489                                                        
          Application No. 09/949,736                                                  

                    19.  An apparatus for removing a plastic resin                    
               encapsulant form an encapsulated integrated circuit                    
               comprising:                                                            
                    a chamber having an optical opening, a dispersion                 
               fluid inlet and an exhaust outlet;                                     
                    a laser mounted on the outside of the chamber and                 
               aligned with the optical opening for directing a laser beam            
               onto a surface of the encapsulated integrated circuit for              
               selectively removing portions of the encapsulant; and                  
                    means for relatively moving the integrated circuit                
               with respect to the laser beam.                                        
                    37.  An apparatus for removing encapsulant from a                 
          device [sic] under test (DUT), the apparatus comprising:                    
                         a chamber having an optical opening, a dispersion            
          fluid inlet and an exhaust outlet, the optical opening adapted to           
          allow a laser to direct a laser beam on a surface of the DUT for            
          removing portions of the encapsulant;                                       
                         a stage in the chamber adapted to receive and hold           
          the DUT; and                                                                
                         a dust bin in the chamber adapted to collect                 
          debris from the removed portions of the encapsulant.                        
                              THE PRIOR ART REFERENCES                                
               The examiner relies upon the following prior art references            
          in support of the Sections 102(b) and 103(a) rejections before              
          us:                                                                         




                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007