Ex Parte McCann et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written         
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   
                                                                                                            
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte DENIS JOHN McCANN and ANDREW JOHN WARD                                     
                                               ____________                                                  
                                           Appeal No. 2005-2669                                              
                                         Application No. 10/122,774                                          
                                               ____________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                    
                                               ____________                                                  
            Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
            BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               



                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 11-34.               
            Claims 35-37 stand objected to as depending from a rejected claim but are otherwise              
            indicated to be allowable.                                                                       
            We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                               












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007