Appeal No. 2005-2584 Application No. 09/897,331 claim 13 is directly analogous to the routing of the location service massage between the location server and the mobile station of claim 1.” Appellants present similar arguments directed to claim 17. We concur with the appellants. Claims 13 and 17 are method claims and contain the same steps discussed supra with respect to claims 1 and 5. Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of independent claims 13, 17 and dependent claims 14 through 16 and 18 through 20 for the reasons stated supra with respect to claims 1 and 5. 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007