Ex Parte Afriat - Page 6


                Appeal No.  2005-2743                                                   Page 6                 
                Application No.  09/847,388                                                                    
                      We are also not persuaded by the examiner’s assertion that oils and                      
                lipophilic agents can be added to the Sebillotte-Amaud composition.  As we                     
                understand the examiner’s statement of the rejection, Sebillotte-Amaud is relied               
                upon to teach active agents that can be added to the composition taught by                     
                Castro.  Accordingly, it is unclear why the examiner has addressed other                       
                ingredients that may be present in the Sebillotte-Amaud composition.  The                      
                examiner provides no evidence that the presence of these other ingredients                     
                transforms the Sebillotte-Amaud composition into an emulsion similar to Castro’s               
                composition.  Accordingly, there is no evidence of record to rebut appellant’s                 
                assertion that a person of ordinary skill in the art would not turn to Sebillotte-             
                Amaud to select active agents that could be added to the composition taught by                 
                Castro.                                                                                        
                      As set forth in In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, 1369-70, 55 USPQ2d 1313,                    
                1316 (Fed. Cir. 2000):                                                                         
                      A critical step in analyzing the patentability of claims pursuant to                     
                      section 103(a) is casting the mind back to the time of invention, to                     
                      consider the thinking of one of ordinary skill in the art, guided only                   
                      by the prior art references and the then-accepted wisdom in the                          
                      field.  …  Close adherence to this methodology is especially                             
                      important in cases where the very ease with which the invention                          
                      can be understood may prompt one “to fall victim to the insidious                        
                      effect of a hindsight syndrome wherein that which only the invention                     
                      taught is used against its teacher.”                                                     
                                                      …                                                        
                      Most if not all inventions arise from a combination of old elements.                     
                      …  Thus, every element of a claimed invention may often be found                         
                      in the prior art.  …  However, identification in the prior art of each                   
                      individual part claimed is insufficient to defeat patentability of the                   
                      whole claimed invention.  …  Rather, to establish obviousness                            
                      based on a combination of the elements disclosed in the prior art,                       
                      there must be some motivation, suggestion or teaching of the                             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007