Ex Parte Johnson et al - Page 3



            Appeal No. 2006-0070                                                     Παγε 3                                 
            Application No. 10/024,631                                                                                      

                  d) causing an individual in need of the medicament to chew                                                
            the product.                                                                                                    
                  38.  A coated chewing gum product with absorption                                                         
            acceleration of caffeine, comprising;                                                                           
                  a) a chewing gum center comprising a gum base, a flavor, and                                              
            a bulking/sweetening agent;                                                                                     
                  b) a chewing gum coating comprising caffeine and a polyol                                                 
            selected from the group consisting of sorbitol and xylitol; and                                                 
                  c) a bicarbonate salt incorporated into the chewing gum                                                   
            center, the coating, or both.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                           
                  The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                     
            examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                  
            Hill      5,380,530   Jan. 10, 1995                                                                             
            Andersen et al. (Andersen) 5,487,902   Jan. 30, 1996                                                            
            Gudas et al. (Gudas)  WO 98/23165  Jun. 4, 1998                                                                 
            (Published International Patent Application)                                                                    
                  Claims 1 through 22, 25 through 27, 30 through 34 and 37                                                  
            stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by the                                                   
            disclosure of Hill.  See the Office action dated July 29, 2004,                                                 
            page 2 and the Answer, page 3.  Claims 28, 29, 35, 36 and 38                                                    
            stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the                                                
            combined disclosures of Hill, Andersen and Gudas.  See the Office                                               
            action dated July 29, 2004, pages 3 and 4 and the Answer, page 3.                                               
                                               OPINION                                                                      
                  For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the examiner’s                                                













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007