Ex Parte Fecteau et al - Page 9



                Appeal No. 2006-0178                                                                                                            
                Application No. 09/877,188                                                                                                      

                         Accordingly, we hereby remand this application to the examiner for the purpose of                                      
                addressing and resolving on the written record whether claim 118 should be rejected under                                       
                35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by, or under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over,                                  
                Christensen taken alone (or in combination with other prior art under § 103).                                                   
                         Independent claim 104 is directed to a snowmobile having the above-discussed feature as                                
                well as the feature wherein the frame is between about 1493 mm and 1913 mm long.  These two                                     
                features are the only limitations of claim 104 which have been argued by the appellants in their                                
                brief.  In this regard, the appellants contend that “Claim 104 is not anticipated or rendered                                   
                obvious by Christensen … as there is no disclosure or suggestion of a steering position disposed                                
                forward of the forward-most drive track axle, nor is there any disclosure or suggestion of a frame                              
                between 1493 and 1913 mm long” (Brief, page 69).                                                                                
                         Again, there is no convincing merit in the appellants’ argument concerning the steering                                
                position feature.  As for the claim length feature, it is true that the Christensen patent contains no                          
                teaching or suggestion of appellants’ claimed frame length.  However, it is significant that                                    
                patentee repeatedly describes his snowmobile as being conventional except for the steering                                      
                system or suspension of his invention (e.g., see lines 37-39 in column 1 and lines 12-14 in                                     
                column 2).  This is significant because the conventional snowmobile disclosed in Figure 8 of the                                
                appellants’ drawing has a frame length which reasonably appears to be within the here claimed                                   
                range of between about 1493 mm and 1913 mm.  For example, in the conventional short frame                                       
                snowmobile of Figure 8, the distances for reference characters B, D, F and N total 1575 mm.                                     
                This fact reasonably supports the proposition that a conventional short frame snowmobile                                        
                possesses a frame length within the appellants’ claimed range.  Since the snowmobile of                                         


                                                                       9                                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007