Appeal No. 2006-0178
Application No. 09/877,188
Under these circumstances, we hereby remand this application to the examiner for the
additional purpose of addressing and resolving on the written record whether independent claim
52 should be rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Christensen in view
of the appellants’ admitted prior art.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
This application is remanded to the examiner.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
Bradley R. Garris )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Charles E. Frankfort ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
Jeffrey V. Nase )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BRG/cam
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007