Ex Parte Fuentes et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0312                                                        
          Application No. 10/145,171                                                  

               In addition to the admitted prior art found in appellants’             
          specification, the examiner relies upon the following references:           
          Mitsubishi Elec. Corp.         02-111506            Apr.  2, 1990           
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)(hereinafter referred to             
          as JP ‘506).                                                                
          Hitachi, Ltd.                  04-7855              Jan. 13, 1992           
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)(hereinafter referred to             
          as JP ‘855).                                                                
          Fuji Film Micro Device KK,     06-310480            Nov.  4, 1994           
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)(hereinafter referred to             
          as JP ‘480).                                                                
          Toshiba Corp.                  08-124885            May  17, 1996           
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)(hereinafter referred to             
          as JP ‘885).                                                                
          Disco Abrasive Sys., Ltd.      10-15790             Jan. 20, 1998           
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)(hereinafter referred to             
          as JP ‘790).                                                                
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to an apparatus              
          for reducing the thickness of a substrate, such as a                        
          semiconductor wafer, with a grinder.  The apparatus comprises an            
          air ionizing source which directs ionized air onto the substrate            
          prior to its dicing and after the thickness of the substrate is             
          reduced by the grinder.  The ionized air reduces accumulation of            
          undesirable electrostatic charge on the substrate and reduces its           
          warpage.                                                                    
               Appealed claims 10, 11 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 102(b) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35                 
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over JP ‘790.  The appealed           
          claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as follows:                  
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007