Appeal No. 2006-0312
Application No. 10/145,171
specification relates that substrate warpage is reduced as a
result of the exposure of the substrate to ionized air.
Appellants have advanced no reason why the ionized air treatment
of JP ‘790 would not result in a reduction in warpage of the
substrate.
As a final point, we note that appellants bases no argument
upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected
results.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well-
stated by the examiner, the examiner’s decision rejecting the
appealed claims is affirmed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007