Ex Parte Chebiam et al - Page 7


               Appeal No. 2006-0313                                                                                                  
               Application 10/300,276                                                                                                

               organic additives as optional ingredients, arguing that since these ingredients need not be                           
               present, then they are not present, and thus, “without the chelating agent, all of the limitations of                 
               the present application are not taught and the Section 102 rejection is without merit” (brief, page                   
               9).  Appellants further argue that “[t]he additional [sic, addition] of both phosphorous and boron                    
               are not optional, rather they are a mandatory teaching, and would result in a                                         
               cobalt/phosphorous/boron layer, rather than a cobalt layer,” and “both of which are beyond the                        
               limitation of the transitional phase ‘consisting essentially of’ and which would materially affect                    
               the basic and novel characteristic(s) of the claimed invention” (id., pages 9-10).                                    
                       The examiner responds that Dubin teaches plating solutions that contain chelating agents                      
               with and without organic additives, both of which fall within appealed claim 1 (answer, page 5).                      
               The examiner finds that “[a]mmonium hypophosphite (a phosphorous source) and                                          
               dimethylamine borate (a boron source) are well known reducing agents and are not excluded by”                         
               appealed claim 1, and “it is clear from [Dubin] that the phosphorous and boron in the plate                           
               would follow from the oxidation of the hypophosphite and dimethylamine borate reducing                                
               agents” (id., pages 5-6).                                                                                             
                       We find substantial evidence in Dubin supporting the examiner’s position.  We find as a                       
               matter of fact that Dubin provides a pattern of preferences describing electroless cobalt plating                     
               solutions encompassed by appealed claim 1, as we interpreted this claim above, to one skilled in                      
               this art within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 102(e).  Indeed, the electroless plating solutions                         
               described by Dubin contain the four ingredients specified in claim 1.  In this respect, Dubin                         
               discloses to one skilled in this art that shunt material 180 is formed on copper interconnect                         
               material 160, which can be a copper alloy, by electroless plating which involves placing                              
               structure 100 in a bath containing metal ions to be plated and one or more reducing agents (e.g.,                     
               col. 4,     ll. 31-35 and 60-62, and col. 5, ll. 12-24; FIGs. 1 and 2).  Dubin teaches that the shunt                 
               material can be cobalt and alloys of cobalt, including cobalt phosphorous and cobalt-boron, and                       
               that phosphorous and boron “are added to the shunt material as a result of reducing agent                             
               oxidation” (col. 5, ll. 30-33 and 50-52).  Dubin provides direction to an electroless cobalt plating                  
               solution through the following pattern of preferences: “introducing metal ions of cobalt, metal                       
               ions (shunt precursors) such as cobalt chloride, cobalt sulfate, . . . alone” (col. 5, l. 63, to col. 6, l.           
               1); “[t]o introduce the metal ions onto a conductive surface such as copper . . . one or more                         

                                                                - 7 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007