Appeal No. 2006-0313
Application 10/300,276
We further suggest that the examiner apply each of Malik and Dubin to the appealed
claims under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) in order to fully comprehend the scope of the claimed invention
encompassed by the appealed claims vis-à-vis the applied prior art.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2005).
AFFIRMED
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007