Ex Parte MIYAGAWA et al - Page 11




               Appeal No. 2006-0386                                                                                              
               Application 09/460,222                                                                                            

                              The reference shows an optical recording and reproducing                                           
                      apparatus comprising N converging means (elements 8 and 9 of Fig. 1                                        
                      and Figs 2(a)-2(d)), disc discriminating means 10, and control means 11 &                                  
                      16.                                                                                                        
                              With respect to the limitation of claim 6 see Fig. 1, elements 3                                   
                      regarding the light source, objective lens 8, photodetectors 14 & 15,                                      
                      selecting one of the aberration correcting means Figs 2(a)-2(d), disc                                      
                      discriminating means 10, and control means 11 & 16.                                                        
               Id. at 3-4.   The remaining claims were indicated to be patentable over the prior art:                            
                              Claims 2-5, and 7-30 are objected to as being dependent upon a                                     
                      rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent                                    
                      form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening                                
                      claims.                                                                                                    
                              None of the cited prior art shows or teaches an optical head                                       
                      apparatus comprising a plurality of heads (objective lenses) or converging                                 
                      grating couplers, a light beam, photodetectors, moving means, selective                                    
                      means, a disc discriminating means and a control means for generating a                                    
                      control signal to the selecting means to select a grating coupler or an                                    
                      optical head (objective lens) in which the occurrence of aberration of the                                 
                      disc is smallest in accordance with the disc discriminating signal.                                        
               Id. at 4.                                                                                                         
                      Appellants responded to the rejections with an amendment which: canceled (a)                               
               claims 1 and 6 (b) claims 11 and 21 (dependent on claim 1), and (c) claims 16 and 26                              
               (depended on claim 6); and rewrote claims 2, 4, 5, and 7-9 (directed to the first through                         
               third and fifth through eighth embodiments) in independent form while also amending                               
               claims 4 and 7 in response to the § 112, ¶ 2 criticisms of those claims.  The “Remarks”                           
               portion of the amendment read in pertinent part as follows:                                                       
                              The applicants acknowledge with appreciation the indication in the                                 
                      outstanding Office Action that claims 2-5 and 7-30 are directed to                                         
                      allowable subject matter.  Only claims 1 and 6 stand rejected on art;                                      
                      claims 1 and 6 are hereby canceled.  In addition, claims 11 and 21,                                        

                                                              11                                                                 





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007