Ex Parte MIYAGAWA et al - Page 12




               Appeal No. 2006-0386                                                                                              
               Application 09/460,222                                                                                            

                      dependent from claim 1, are also canceled, while claims 16 and 26,                                         
                      dependent from claim 6, are canceled.                                                                      
                              Claims 2, 4, 5 and 7-9 have been rewritten in independent form and                                 
                      also amended to overcome the §112, second paragraph, rejections.                                           
                      Regarding claim 4, the applicants note that the control means selects one                                  
                      of a plurality of light emitting means which are associated with the                                       
                      converging optical systems.  By selecting one of the light emitting means,                                 
                      an aberration caused by the difference of the disk substrate thickness is                                  
                      minimized.  Regarding claims 6 and 7 [sic;      claim 7], the control means                                
                      is defined as generating a control signal which is provided to the selecting                               
                      means in accordance with the discrimination signal.  Regarding the issues                                  
                      raised in the Office Action concerning claim 30, it is noted that this claim                               
                      depends indirectly on claim 9, and the “N converging grating couplers” are                                 
                      defined in claim 9.   It is respectfully submitted that all pending claims are                             
                      now in full compliance with §112 and are in condition for allowance.                                       
               (Emphasis added.)  November 17, 1992, Amendment at 9.                                                             
                      Following entry of this amendment, the ‘629 application issued as Patent                                   
               5,235,581 on   August 10, 1993.  Amended application claims 2, 4, 5, and 7-9 became                               
               claims 1, 7, 10, 13, 16, and 19, respectively, of the patent.                                                     
               F.  The Reissue Application                                                                                       
                      Of the three independent claims (26, 28, 34) before us, claim 26 is the broadest                           
                      (emphasis                                                                                                  
               added):                                                                                                           
                              26.  An optical recording/reproducing apparatus for recording,                                     
                      reproducing or erasing an information signal onto/from any one of N types                                  
                      (where N ≥ 2) of optical discs having first layers of different thicknesses,                               
                      each type of said optical discs having at least said first layer being                                     
                      transparent and a second layer for storing information, by converging a                                    
                      light flux onto said second layer through said first layer of one of said N                                
                      types of optical discs loaded in said apparatus said apparatus comprising:                                 
                      a composite converging optical device comprising:                                                          
                              (i) a light emitting means for emitting said light flux;                                           

                                                              12                                                                 





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007