The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HORST G. ZERBE and FADIA AL-KHALIL __________ Appeal No. 2006-0442 Application No. 10/123,142 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to a breath-freshening composition, which the examiner has rejected as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We reverse. Background “Water-soluble films for oral administration of therapeutic agents are well known in the art. It is also known in the art to use such films for administering a breath freshening agent, e.g., menthol. The known films for administering breath freshening agents and/or active pharmaceutical agents are generally comprised of at least one water-soluble polymer suitable for human consumption and at least one compound that enhances thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007