Appeal No. 2006-0442 Page 10 Application No. 10/123,142 The examiner has not shown that the teachings of the references or knowledge of those skilled in the art would have led a skilled worker to expect that maltodextrin would be useful as a film-forming agent in edible films, or that the skilled worker would have found it obvious to incorporate a particulate flavor-delivery material in edible films. Since the examiner has not made out a prima facie case of obviousness, we reverse the rejection of claims 2, 12, 22, and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Summary The examiner has not adequately explained why the prior art would have suggested the claimed compositions and therefore we reverse the rejections on appeal. REVERSED Donald E. Adams ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007