Appeal No. 2006-0442 Page 4 Application No. 10/123,142 lines 14-23; and column 3, lines 32-35). See the Examiner’s Answer, page 4. However, “Zerbe . . . [does] not teach the use of modified starch in the film.” Id., page 6. The examiner relied on Leung to make up for this deficiency. The examiner characterized Leung as “teach[ing] fast dissolving, orally consumable, edible films comprising suitable film-forming agents of high amylose starch, modified starch such as hydroxypropylated high amylose starch, in combination with dextrin, hydroxypropyl cellulose, various surfactants and flavorants . . . (see reference column 4, line 64 – col. 5, line 22).” Id. The examiner concluded that it would have been obvious to use the combined reference teachings of Leung et al. within Zerbe et al. because the reference of Leung et al. shows the use of modified starches, such as hydroxypropylated high amylose starch in combination with hydroxypropyl cellulose, dextrin and surfactants and flavorants to obtain a fast dissolving film that provides breath-deodorizing properties and similarly Zerbe et al. teach a water-soluble film for oral administration comprising film-forming substances, surfactants and flavorants whereby the film provides instant wettability, rapid dissolution and rapid disintegration upon oral administration in the oral cavity. The expected result would be an effective, fast-dissolving film preparation beneficial for treating oral hygiene conditions. Examiner’s Answer, page 7. Appellants argue that Leung’s “lengthy list of possible ingredients, especially when considered in view of the preference for pullulan and the 39 examples (containing pullulan or polyvinyl pyrrolidone), none of which contains either hydroxypropyl cellulose or a modified starch, is merely an invitation to experiment with the use of film-forming agents other than the preferred pullulan. An invitation to try various combinations that are not preferred is nothing more than a starting point for experimentation.” Appeal Brief, pages 6-7. Appellants argue that the film-forming agents disclosed by Leung can bePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007