Ex Parte Perego et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2006-0545                                                                          Page 3                  
               Application No. 10/019,273                                                                                            



                               contacting the mixture with colloidal silica to form a homogeneous                                    
                       gel,                                                                                                          
                               crystallizing the gel under hydrothermal conditions to obtain a first                                 
                       solid,                                                                                                        
                               washing the first solid with water to form a second solid,                                            
                               calcining the second solid in air to form a calcined solid,                                           
                               subjecting the calcined solid to an ion exchange using an aqueous                                     
                       solution of ammonium acetate to form a third solid, and                                                       
                               calcining the third solid in air.                                                                     

                       The Examiner cited the following references in rejecting the appealed claims:                                 
               Rosinski et al.  (Rosinski)          3,832,449   Aug.  27, 1974                                                       
               Leyshon et al.  (Leyshon)         5,026,936   Jun.  25, 1991                                                          

                       The Examiner entered the following rejections (Answer, pp. 3-5):                                              
                       Claims 17-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                                       
               indefinite.                                                                                                           
                       Claims 17-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as failing to                             
               satisfy the written description requirement thereof.                                                                  
                       Claims 1-14 and 17-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable                                 
               over the combination of Leyshon and Rosinski.                                                                         










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007