Ex Parte Shirk et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                                                                                                    
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                    
                                                       __________                                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                     
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                      
                                                       __________                                                                    
                                               Ex parte RYAN C. SHIRK,                                                               
                                  STEPHEN M. SANOCKI, JOSEPH C. PEISERT,                                                             
                                ROGER L. LANGER, LOYD R. HORNBACK III and                                                            
                                                    IAN R. HARDING                                                                   
                                                       __________                                                                    
                                                 Appeal No. 2006-0583                                                                
                                               Application No. 10/322,008                                                            
                                                       __________                                                                    
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                                     
                                                           __________                                                                
       Before GARRIS, PAK and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
       GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 24-28, 30-34 and 46.                                            
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of making a pollution control device                                 
       which comprises providing a flexible and self-supporting insulating end cone of insulating                                    
       material and disposing the insulating end cone between inner and outer end cone housings of                                   
       the pollution control device.  Further details regarding this subject matter are set forth in                                 
       representative independent claim 24, which reads as follows:                                                                  








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007