Ex Parte Shirk et al - Page 5

       Appeal No. 2006-0583                                                                                                          
       Application No. 10/322,008                                                                                                    



       would have been motivated to combine the applied prior art in the manner proposed by the                                      
       examiner in order to obtain the preformed insulation disclosed by Farr via a manufacture                                      
       technique evinced by Mocker to be known in the prior art as effective.                                                        
               The decision of the examiner is affirmed.                                                                             
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be                                 
       extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a) (Sept. 13, 2004).                                                                            
                                                           AFFIRMED                                                                  







                                       Bradley R. Garris   )                                                                         
                                       Administrative Patent Judge )                                                                 
                                                                              )                                                      
                                                                              )                                                      
                                                                              ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                       Chung K. Pak   )                                                                              
                                       Administrative Patent Judge )   APPEALS AND                                                   
                                                                              )                                                      
                                                                              ) INTERFERENCES                                        
                                                                              )                                                      
                                       Beverly A. Franklin   )                                                                       
                                       Administrative Patent Judge )                                                                 


               BRG/cam                                                                                                               






                                                                 5                                                                   



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007