The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MARK DUCHOW ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0597 Application No. 09/682,876 ____________ HEARD: March 23, 2006 ____________ Before WARREN, WALTZ, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 76 through 93, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellant, the invention is directed to a method of distributing incentive vouchers over the Internet to cause customers to come into participating dealers or “resellers” (Brief, page 2). Further details of the invention may be gleaned from thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007