THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte AIKO HANYU, SCOTT D. COOPER
and MARK MILLER
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-0612
Application 09/810,956 1
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
This case is not ripe for meaningful review and is,
therefore, remanded to the examiner for appropriate action
consistent with the views expressed below.
The examiner has rejected, inter alia, claims 1, 6 through
11, 14 through 19, 24, 25, 28 through 30, 33, 35 through 38, 41
1 Application for patent filed March 16, 2001.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007