The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte ARTHUR A. KEY, JEFFREY JOHN THOMAS MATTHEW RICHARD GLEISER and ALFRED D. NAPOLITANO, JR. ______________ Appeal No. 2006-0617 Application 10/209,887 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 8. Claims 9 through 13, the only other claims remaining in the application, have been withdrawn from further consideration. Subsequent to the final rejection, the examiner has withdrawn rejections of claims 1 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph; claims 1 through 4 and 6 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Nemoto (5,927,813); and claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007