Ex Parte Key et al - Page 5

             Appeal No. 2006-0617                                                                                  
             Application 10/209,887                                                                                

             In light of the foregoing, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of independent                
             claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), or of dependent claims 3 and 6 through 8, based              
             on Wardell. Thus, the decision of the examiner is reversed.                                           


                                                     REVERSED                                                      







               CHARLES E. FRANKFORT        )           Administrative                                              
                                        Patent Judge )                                                             
                                          )                                                                        
                                                )                                                                  
                                                         )                                                         
                       TERRY J. OWENS          ) BOARD OF PATENT                                                   
                                 Administrative Patent Judge )     APPEALS                                         
                                        )      AND                                                                 
                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                
                                                         )                                                         
                                        MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD         )                                              
                                 Administrative Patent Judge )                                                     
                                                                                                                  











                                                          5                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007