Appeal No. 2006-0629 Παγε 6 Application No. 10/668,021 device. The examiner asserts (answer, pages 3 and 4) that a conditioner is inherently a CMP device that is used to treat the polishing pad, and that the conditioner must be a “pressure related component.” As evidence of inherency, the examiner turns to Berman for a disclosure that the CMP process is controlled by a process called conditioning, and that during conditioning, the conditioner is brought into contact with the surface of the pad. The examiner points to Lin (col. 3, lines 20-33) for a disclosure that “it is desirable to engage the conditioner 12 against the surface of the pad 16 with a known and repeatable force, and also with a force that is known and preferably uniform across the conditioner 12.” From our review of Lin, we agree with appellants that the invention is directed to detecting pressure distribution on a wafer surface by employing pressure sensitive films on located on various pressure components such as a wafer carrier, polishing pad, and mechanical arm members of a CMP machine (col. 1, lines 12-16). As shown in figure 3B, pressure sensitive film PSF2 is located between wafer 30 and polishing pad 34. Lin further discloses (col. 3, lines 37-42) that “in addition, the pressure components applied in the embodiment of the present inventionPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007