Appeal No. 2006-0697
Reexamination 90/006,402
particular prior art without identifying anything in particular. We suggest that the appellant
specifically disclose and call the examiner’s attention to the closest such prior art.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 1-7, 10-13, and 16-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Chan and Tanenbaum is reversed.
The rejection of claims 8, 14, and 18-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Chan, Tanenbaum, and Smith is reversed.
The rejection of claims 9 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Chan,
Tanenbaum, and Bales is reversed.
REVERSED
/Jameson Lee/
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
/Adriene Lepiane Hanlon/ ) BOARD OF PATENT
ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
16
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007