Appeal No. 2006-0762 Page 8 Application No. 09/982,113 CONCLUSION Because the examiner has set forth a prima facie case of obviousness for all of the appealed claims, the rejection of claims 138 to 141 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over the combination of Mehta and Ulukaya is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge ) LG/dmPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007