Appeal No. 2006-0823 Παγε 2 Application No. 10/284,474 initially closed via a plastic wall at at least one end, and wherein the hinge pin is held in the hinge line via contraction of an entry hole formed by passing the hinge pin through the plastic wall. 5. A hinge assembly for securing a lid to a container, the hinge assembly comprising: a hinge line formed in one of the lid and the container, at least one end of the hinge line being initially closed via a plastic wall; and a substantially straight hinge pin secured in the hinge line via contraction of an entry hole formed by passing the hinge pin through the plastic wall. The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Schurman 3,886,645 Jun. 03, 1975 Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Schurman. OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to the appellant's specification and claims, to the applied prior art reference, and to the respective positions articulated by appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations which follow. The initial inquiry into determining the propriety of the examiner’s Section 102(b) rejection is to correctly construe thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007