Ex Parte Adaeda et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not           
                           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                                                                      

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                             __________                                                
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                             __________                                                
                               Ex parte SHIRO ADAEDA, TATSUYA ANMA                                     
                                       and HIDEAKI TAKAHASHI                                           
                                             __________                                                
                                         Appeal No. 2006-0859                                          
                                       Application No. 09/778,338                                      
                                             __________                                                
                                         HEARD: July 11, 2006                                          
                                             __________                                                
            Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                    
            MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7 and 9-11. Claim  
            8 has been canceled.                                                                       


                                               Invention                                               
                  Appellants’ invention relates to a rotating machine having a plurality of            
            permanent magnets and a plurality of armatures.  The armatures are formed from             
            lamination of a plurality of steel plates each having a thickness in the range of 0.25 to  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007