Ex Parte FEENEY et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-0911                                                                 Παγε 2                                        
              Application No. 09/248,595                                                                                                         


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                                                   
                     The appellants' invention relates to a game ball having increased resistance to                                             
              moisture absorption.  Claim 3 is the only claim pending in this application and reads as                                           
              follows:                                                                                                                           
                            3.  A game ball having increased resistance to moisture                                                              
                            absorption comprising a natural leather cover disposed over                                                          
                            a lining, the leather of said cover having increased water                                                           
                            resistance properties distributed throughout during a tanning                                                        
                            process, wherein when said ball is subjected to six 45 minute                                                        
                            cycles of a rain test and said ball is permitted to dry at                                                           
                            approximately 70oF for 24 hours between cycles, said ball                                                            
                            contains an amount of water at the conclusion of each said                                                           
                            rain test cycle as expressed as a ratio of the weight of the                                                         
                            ball with absorbed water to the weight of the dry ball, an                                                           
                            average per cycle ratio at the conclusion of said six rain test                                                      
                            cycles being a maximum of 1.20:1.                                                                                    

                     Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing                                               
              subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable                                             
              one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to                                         
              make and/or use the invention and as containing subject matter which was not                                                       
              described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in                                             
              the art that appellants had possession of the claimed invention.  In other words, claim 3                                          
              stands rejected for failure of the specification to comply with the enablement                                                     
              requirement and the written description or possession requirement.                                                                 



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007