Appeal No. 2006-0927
Application No. 09/949,488
With regard to other claims, e.g., claim 7, which recite
“appending” user context information, we view such language similar
to the “adding” language with which we dealt supra. Thus, we are
unconvinced by appellants’ arguments in this regard.
Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of claims 1-26
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
The examiner’s decision is affirmed.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007