Ex Parte Ramakesavan et al - Page 1




                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                                        for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                               
                                                        ____________                                                               

                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                          Ex parte: SUNDARAM RAMAKESAVAN                                                           
                                                     and PHILLIP J. SILVIA                                                         
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                                     Appeal No. 2006-0944                                                          
                                                   Application No. 09/895,584                                                      
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                         ____________                                                              
               Before  Hairston , Krass and Blankenship, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               Krass, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 

                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9, 11-21, and 24-30.                      
                       The invention is directed to a method, article and system for selecting wireless devices.                   
               The method is set forth in representative independent claim 1, reproduced as follows:                               
                       1. A method comprising:                                                                                     
                       remotely selecting one of a plurality of devices for wireless communications using                          
                       a device having operators associated with at least two of said devices, and enabling                        
                       different actuations of said operators to be interpreted selectively as either the selection                
                       of a device for communication or the programming of the operator to communicate                             
                       upon actuation with a particular device.                                                                    


                                                                -1-                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007