Ex Parte Ramakesavan et al - Page 11

               Appeal No. 2006-0944                                                                                                
               Application No. 09/895,584                                                                                          


                       Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 30 under 35 U.S.C. §103.                            


                                                     CONCLUSION                                                                    
                       We have sustained the rejection of claims 21 and 24-29 under 35 U.S.C. §103 but we                          
               have not sustained the rejection of claims 1-9, 11-20, and 30 under 35 U.S.C. §103.                                 
                       Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                                              
                       No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be                       
               extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                                                   
                                                          AFFIRMED                                                                 


                                      KENNETH W. HAIRSTON                           )                                              
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                              
                                                                                    )                                              
                                                                                    )                                              
                                                                                    )                                              
                                                                                    ) BOARD OF PATENT                              
                                      ERROL A. KRASS                                )         APPEALS                              
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )              AND                             
                                                                                    )   INTERFERENCES                              
                                                                                    )                                              
                                                                                    )                                              
                                                                                    )                                              
                                      HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP                         )                                              
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                              



               EAK/dpv                                                                                                             
                                                               -11-                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007