Appeal No. 2006-0945
Application No. 10/245,888
We note that all of the argued limitations are contained in these Narita portions and that
the examiner’s determination of obviousness [see Answer at p. 6-7] is agreed with, and therefore
the rejection is sustained.
Accordingly, the decision to reject claim 4 as being unpatentable over 35 U.S.C. § 103
over Narita is affirmed.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007