Ex Parte Cannata et al - Page 27



           Appeal No. 2006-1049                                                                     
           Application No. 09/667,826                                                               

                 76. Ultimately, reissue claims 1, 5-7, 12-13, 15, 19, 21-22, 24-25, 40-50          
           and 52-58 were rejected, reissue claim 51 was objected to as a duplicate of claim        
           20, and claims 2-4, 8-11, 14, 16-18, 20, 23, and 26-35 were indicated as allowable.      
                 77. Reissue application claims 1, 5-7, 12-13, 15, 19, 21-22, 24-25, 40-50          
           and 52-58 are before the Board in the appeal.                                            
                 78.  A copy of patent (reissue) claims 1, 5-7, 12-13, 15, 19, 21-22, 24-25         
           appears in Appendix 5 of this opinion.   A copy of reissue application claims 40-50      
           and 52-58 appears in Appendix 6 of this opinion.                                         
                 79. The Examiner has rejected reissue application claims 40-50 and 52-58           
           under 35 U.S.C. § 251 maintaining that the claims seek to "recapture" subject            
           matter surrendered in obtaining allowance of the claims which appear in the patent       
           sought to be reissued.                                                                   











                                               - 27 -                                               




Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007