Appeal No. 2006-1049 Application No. 09/667,826 70. In the Examiner’s Amendment at pages 2-3, the examiner stated as follows: [T]he prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest an infrared imaging system or focal plane array having in combination with the other required elements, the means for correcting specified by independent claim 2, 24, 33 or 37. 71. Consistent with Office practice, the claims were re-numbered in the course of preparing the original application for issue, all as follows: Chronological by original claim Original claim number Claim as re-numbered 1 Cancelled 2 1 3 2 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 12 10 13 11 14 12 19 13 20 14 3 15 4 16 10 17 11 18 21 - 22 -Page: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007